For most users legal norms, entering into an inheritance brings additional material benefits.
However, often an inheritance can cause a number of temporary losses and unplanned financial expenses, which is why a full assessment of it is necessary before entering into an inheritance.
Thus, it will be possible to avoid most of the problems associated with going through this procedure, and there will also be strong arguments for making a decision to recognize oneself as an heir or not.
Before collecting documents and looking for experts to conduct the assessment procedure market value vehicle(TS), consult on the most pressing issues with a lawyer who can clearly explain the entire process from auto examination to obtaining inheritance rights.
If you are driving a car under a power of attorney issued during the owner’s lifetime and are his legal successor, for further exploitation TS you need to go through the inheritance procedure.
A power of attorney for a car is automatically revoked upon the death of the principal.
Acceptance of inheritance
To enter into an inheritance by law or by will, you must submit an application to a notary to obtain a certificate of inheritance. It is this document that will serve as the basis for re-registration of vehicles in the traffic police.
The deadline for filing an application to establish the right of inheritance is:
- 6 months– for heirs of the first stage;
- 3 months– for heirs of the second stage.
If the heir of a motor vehicle (AMTS) does not promptly apply to the notary company for a certificate, he will have to go to court to establish his right of inheritance.
Estimation of the market value of the vehicle
The vehicle assessment procedure is a whole complex of activities, which includes an analysis of the technical condition of the vehicle, as well as a detailed study of all accompanying documents.
The process of evaluating an inherited object is strictly regulated by the Law on Valuation Activities in the Russian Federation No. 135-FZ and the standards FSO-1, FSO-2, FSO-3.
The exchange (market) value of motor vehicles when registering an inheritance is determined on the date of death of the owner.
Due to the fact that by the time of applying for recognition of the right of inheritance, a certain time period has passed during which the condition of the inherited object could have changed, an inspection of the vehicle for the assessment is not required.
Assessment methodology
There are three main methods for calculating the cost of motor vehicles:
- expensive;
- market;
- profitable.
In most cases, to assess the value of a car when registering inheritance rights, expert appraisers use the second method.
Market approach
This is a set of methods for assessing motor vehicles. These methods are based on comparing a car with similar ones based on the information available on them.
Using this method involves comparing and analyzing information about the cost of the machine that is being assessed. Purchase and sale transactions that were recently completed with similar vehicles are also taken into account.
The ultimate goal of the comparative approach is to determine the exact value of the vehicle being evaluated on the market.
Calculation steps:
- Analysis and comparison of purchase and sale transactions involving vehicles similar to the specified one, comparison of the cost of transactions.
- Comparison of a given motor vehicle with selected similar objects, identifying obvious differences in individual characteristics, including dates and places of sale.
- Determination of the market value of a given object, taking into account the adjustment of prices of similar objects in accordance with identified discrepancies.
On final stage calculation of the cost of automatic telephone exchange can be applied following methods:
- The method of paired comparisons - the price of a similar object is compared, which includes the same additional elements as for a given vehicle, with the price of an object that does not have these elements.
- Method of correction coefficients - finding the values of increasing and decreasing coefficients based on data obtained from comparison individual parameters a given object with similar vehicles.
- Determining price by comparison specific indicators(power, motor consumption, etc.)
List of documents
The list of documents and data submitted for the assessment includes:
- Passport details of the person inheriting the vehicle, who is the direct customer of the assessment.
- A copy of the death certificate of the owner of the inherited vehicle.
- Documents for the car (PTS and STS).
- A document confirming the actual mileage of the car.
- Equipment information.
- Data on external damage to the vehicle.
- In case of emergency or after an accident - a vehicle inspection report.
- Data on repairs carried out as a result of an accident.
- Replacement and repair information basic units.
- Data on the presence and absence of encumbrances (collateral, debt obligations, other restrictions).
Market Value Assessment Report
The report must contain the following information and sections:
- The date of the vehicle assessment examination.
- Report number.
- Standards used for evaluation.
- Purpose of the assessment.
- Main reasons for creating this report.
- Basis for the assessment.
- A list of data used in the assessment, on the basis of which the report was created, and the sources of their origin.
- Statement of Conformity.
- Constraints and assumptions used during the valuation.
- Norms of valuation activities, rationale for their application.
- Description of terms and definitions used in the report.
- Information about the assessment procedure.
- Justification for the choice of approaches for determining the cost of an object.
- Description of the object of assessment.
- Review of the market for the subject to be assessed.
- Determination of the market value of automatic telephone exchange.
- Conclusion.
The main requirements of the market value assessment report include the mandatory numbering of all pages, its binding, sealing, and signature of the appraiser. To the report in mandatory Attached is a copy of a document certifying the organization’s right to engage in valuation activities.
If the market value assessment report contains controversial information, it can be challenged by an arbitration or arbitration court.
Notary fees
When entering into an inheritance, you must make a payment in accordance with the tariffs for obtaining a certificate of inheritance.
Rates:
- 0,3% from market price property - spouses, parents, siblings, adopted children;
- 0,6% from the market price of the property - other heirs.
The amount of the state duty is calculated based on the tariff and the market value of the inherited property indicated in the independent expert assessment report provided by the applicant.
Notary offices do not have the right to establish the type of method for calculating the valuation of a vehicle or require confirmation that the valuation was made in a certain way, thus trying to inflate the market value of the inherited object.
To recognize the right of inheritance of a car, the notary must submit following documents:
- Passport of the person entering into the inheritance.
- Death certificate former owner.
- Documents confirming the right of inheritance (will, birth certificate, marriage certificate, etc.).
- Vehicle Passport (PTS).
- Vehicle Registration Certificate (CTC).
- Report on the assessment of the market value of motor vehicles.
Where to make an assessment?
Since the amount of state duty paid directly depends on the market value of the vehicle established by an independent appraiser in the report and can vary greatly depending on the assessment method, the issue of choosing an organization is key.
The right to conduct an independent assessment is held only by those organizations whose experts are members of a self-regulatory organization of appraisers (SRO).
When choosing an organization, except general reviews and comments regarding the work of a particular company, use the so-called method of analyzing an individual representative of the company. That is, make a choice regarding personal qualities and professional characteristics of the specific expert who will accompany your case.
It is also worth paying attention to how flexibly the organization or individual expert whose services you want to use approaches the individual needs of the client.
If you are not entirely sure of the correct choice or have any questions, be sure to consult with a representative of the company or company before entering into a business relationship with it.
COURSE WORK
in the course "Evaluation of machinery, equipment and vehicles"
on the topic: Estimation of the market value of a vehicle
(in the form of a conclusion (report) on the assessment of the GAZ 3307 car)
Determining the market value of vehicles
Market price- the estimated amount of money for which the seller, who has full information about the value of the property and not obliged to sell it, would agree to sell it, and the buyer, who has complete information about the value of the property and is not obliged to purchase it, would agree to purchase it.
Description of the object
Vehicle type: cargo-passenger;
An identification number: HTN 33073081611304
brand, model GAZ 3307;
Model, engine no.: 51100A - U1019578;
Body No.: 309;
Chassis No.: S 1611304 ;
White color ;
Date of issue: 1995
Vehicle passport: 24 KS 970984;
Calculation method
The cost approach to vehicle valuation is based on the fact that the cost of the vehicle being valued is taken to include the cost of its production. Since vehicles are objects of serial and large-scale production, a costly approach is unacceptable in most cases. This is due to the fact that the manufacture of one vehicle - single production, the specific production costs of which are several times higher than with serial production. The cost approach can be used when evaluating converted cars, cars made as an individual creation, and when restoring vintage cars.
The income approach is based on determining the current value of the valuation object as the totality of future income from its use. Since only specific production generates income, the income approach is not used when assessing individual species means of labor, which are an element of production, and are mainly used only for the assessment of an enterprise, production complexes and other business objects. When valuing the income approach, the discounted cash flow method and the income capitalization method are mainly used. For this reason, this report does not evaluate the vehicle using the income approach.
The market (comparative) approach is based on an analysis of the purchase and sale prices of vehicles prevailing in this moment in the primary and secondary markets. The basic principle used is a comparison that should be made to a new vehicle, with adjustments for wear and tear if aftermarket data is not available.
Determining the market value of the GAZ 3307 car using a cost approach
The market value of a vehicle is calculated using formula 1:
Rst = Cv - I, 1)
Where - St - restoration cost or replacement cost. In our case, it would be correct to use replacement cost using a more modern and functional analogue.
I is the total accumulated wear, which is calculated using formula 2:
I = 1- (1-I. physical) * (1-Ifunkts) * (1-Iek),
Where - And physical - physical wear and tear, %
Ifuncts - functional wear, %
Iek - economic depreciation,%
Determining the amount of physical wear
For a more objective definition physical wear and tear We will use the developed guidance documents and methods:
1. RD 37.009.015. - 98 with amendments No. 1,2,3 2001
2. RD 37.009.015. - 98 with amendments No. 1,2,3,4 2005
3. Method of calculating wear according to Yu. V. Andrianov
4. Method according to the depreciation rate
5. Expert method
Calculations of physical wear using the above methods are presented below in Tables 1-5.
Determining the market value of a car, taking into account mileage and duration of operation (Methodological guidelines for determining the cost of vehicles, taking into account normal wear and tear and technical condition at the time of presentation of RD 37.009.015-98. M.: NAMI, 1998.) In accordance with the methodological manual, wear and tear (Itr, %) when evaluating a vehicle can be calculated using formula 3:
Itr = (I1*Pf+I2*Df) *A2*A3*A4 3)
Table 1. Initial vehicle data
| Index | Magnitude | |
| Vehicle make | GAZ 330730 (Van) | |
| Year of issue | 1995 | |
| 40,00 | ||
| 12,42 | ||
| Table 2. Calculation of physical wear and tear according to RD 37.009.015-98 (as amended No. 1, No. 2, No. 3) 2001 | ||
| Index | Magnitude | |
| I1 - mileage wear indicator, % / 1000 km | 0,30 | |
| Pf - actual mileage from the start of operation or after overhaul on the date of inspection, thousand km | 40,00 | |
| 3,22 | ||
| I2 - time indicator of aging, % / year | 1,56 | |
| Df - actual duration of operation, years | 12,42 | |
| 1,12 | ||
| 1,04 | ||
| 1,05 | ||
| 38 | ||
Calculation of physical wear according to RD 37.009.015 - 98 (with amendments No. 1, 2, 3,4) 2005 is carried out according to formula 4:
Itr = I2*Df+I1* (Pf - Ps*Df)) *A2*A3*A4 4)
Table 3. Calculation of physical wear and tear according to RD 37.009.015-98 (as amended No. 1, 2, 3,4) 2005
| Index | Magnitude |
| I2 - average annual wear value for the year of operation of the object (values for various types The telephone exchanges are given in the tables below), percentages | 6,50 |
| Df - actual duration of operation, years | 12,42 |
| Pf - actual mileage since the start of operation or after major repairs as of the date of inspection, thousand km | 40,00 |
| Average annual mileage, thousand km | 3,22 |
| PS - standard average annual mileage, thousand km. | 6,00 |
| I1 - wear correction coefficient depending on the deviation of the actual mileage of the vehicle from the standard annual average, equal to ±0.25% per 1000 km. deviations | -0,0069 |
| A2 - wear correction factor depending on natural and climatic conditions | 1,12 |
| A3 - wear correction coefficient depending on the environmental condition environment | 1,04 |
| A4 - wear correction factor, taking into account the type of region in which the vehicle was operated | 1,05 |
| Itr - physical wear and tear of the vehicle, % | 99 |
Calculation of physical wear and tear according to the depreciation rate is carried out using formula 5:
Itr = Na* Df /100.5)
Where - Na is the depreciation rate for mobile transport. (cm. Unified standards depreciation charges). The calculation is presented in Table 4.
Table 4. Calculation of physical wear and tear according to standard indicators
Formulas for calculation are presented in the table. Using specially developed tables, using the omega value, the function is used to find physical wear. The calculated physical wear must be equal to or slightly different from the tabulated one.
In accordance with RD 34.009.015.98, when establishing the amount of wear, you can also use the expert method, the essence of which is that the amount of wear can be established based on the experience of an expert. Using the expert method, wear is assumed to be 60%.
The calculated wear values are agreed upon and we obtain the final physical wear. (Table 6), which amounted to 62%.
Table 6. Coordination of the amount of physical wear of the vehicle
| Evaluation method | Amount of physical wear, % | Weight coefficient | Result, % |
| Method according to RD 37.009.015-98 | 38% | 0,1 | 4% |
| Method according to standard indicators | 5% | 0,1 | 0% |
| Calculation of physical wear and tear according to the recommendations of the manual Andrianov, Yu.V. Assessment of motor vehicles / Yu.V. Andrianov. - M., 2003. - 486 p. | 74% | 0,7 | 52% |
| Expert method according to RD 37.009.015-98 | 60% | 0,1 | 6% |
| Rd with changes 1,2,3,4 2005 | 99% | 0,0 | 0% |
| Weighted average physical wear and tear | 62% | ||
Determination of the size of functional and external wear
Functional wear and tear (or external wear) of an object of evaluation occurs when newer and more functional objects appear on the market that are capable of fully replacing the object of evaluation. In our case, the object of evaluation is quite outdated and today the production of the GAZ 3307 car has been discontinued, since a more functional analogue of the GAZ 3308 has appeared.
1. Research task
Object of study (assessment): VAZ 21074 2007 car vin release XTA2107407XXXXXXXX, standard.
Date of determination of cost (assessment): 10.10.2010.
Date of examination: 10.10.2012.
2. Presented for research:
2.1. Statement dated 10/08/2012.
2.2. Registration certificate 78УВ534678 for the VAZ 21074 vin XTA2107407XXXXXXX (copy).
3. The research is carried out on the basis of regulatory documentation and information sources:
3.1. Research of motor vehicles in order to determine the cost refurbishment and assessments ( Guidelines for forensic experts). - M.: RFTSSE, SZRTSSE, 2013.
3.2. "Prices for domestic motor vehicles, truck cranes, forklifts, tractors and engines." - M.: PRICE-N, October 2010
3.3. Specialized periodicals for October 2010: “Advertising-Chance”, “From Hand to Hand”, “Pickup”, “Best Choice”.
4. Procedure and stages of the study
Determination of the market value of the vehicle was carried out in the following stages:
4.1. Studying the information provided by the customer in order to obtain information affecting the cost of the research object.
At this stage, the main design characteristics object of study, the degree of its wear is determined.
4.2. Collection of general market data and their analysis.
At this stage, data on similar vehicles offered for sale on the primary and secondary markets of Moscow were collected and analyzed.
A full market analysis of the research object was not carried out, since the assessment is retrospective and an assessment of the degree of influence of the market situation is not required to predict the value of the assessed object.
4.3. Application of approaches to vehicle assessment. To determine the market value of a vehicle, three classical approaches are considered (cost, comparative and income).
The comparative approach is a set of valuation methods based on comparison of the object of evaluation with similar objects presented on the free competitive market.
The income approach is a set of valuation methods based on determining the expected income from the valuation object. The appraiser does not have reliable data on the basis of which it would be possible to predict the flows of income and expenses generated by the valuation object, therefore, in this report, the income approach was not used to determine the market value of the vehicle.
The cost approach is a set of assessment methods based on determining the costs necessary to restore or replace the object being assessed. At the same time, the full replacement cost is understood as the cost of creating at current prices a complete new copy of the appraised object using the same materials, standards, design and with the same quality of work (with all the shortcomings); Replacement cost is understood as the cost of creating, at current prices, an object that has equivalent utility to the valued object, but created from modern materials and in accordance with modern standards and design.
4.4. If several approaches were used to determine the value of the valuation object, then the results obtained for each of them are consistent. The purpose of the approval is to determine the most likely value of the property being assessed by weighing the advantages and disadvantages of the approaches used. Reconciliation allows you to determine the final cost.
5. When examining documents and information provided by the customer, the expert accepted the following qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the research object:
5.1. The registration certificate 78RU355966, issued by Avtovaz OJSC on April 3, 2007, states:
Make, vehicle model: VAZ 21074; release date: 2007; an identification number(VIN): XTA2107407XXXXXXX; body N XTA2107407XXXXXXXX; model, engine N: 3945304; color: red. State register sign S554SK98. Owner (owner): Timofeev Petr Ilyich.
5.2. The condition of the vehicle at the time of the study can be described as satisfactory; the vehicle's mileage as of October 2010 was 50 thousand km. Equipped injection engine. An alarm system has been installed.
6. Determination of market value
6.1. Within the cost approach, the market value of a car was determined as the replacement cost, taking into account the total wear and tear (physical / operational /, functional, economic):
6.1.1. Estimated operational wear:
0.35% x 50 + 1.2% x 3.5 = 21.7%,
where 0.35% is the vehicle wear rate per 1000 km;
14.3 - average annual vehicle mileage, thousand km;
3.5 - the number of years of operation of the car before the date of assessment;
1.2% - vehicle aging rate per year of operation, corresponding average annual mileage 14.3 thousand km.
6.1.2. Due to the fact that at the time of determining the value, cars of this model were discontinued, it is necessary to determine the price of a new similar vehicle as of the valuation date:
0.96 x 208000.00 rub. = 199,680.00 rub.,
where 0.96 is the coefficient of reduction of the price of a discontinued car to the price of an analogue car produced at the time of evaluation;
RUB 208,000.00 - the price of a new analogue car.
6.1.3. The cost of the car after its sale will be:
0.90 x 199 680.00 rub. = 179,712.00 rub.,
where 0.90 is the coefficient of reduction in the price of a car up to 5 years old after its sale;
RUB 199,680.00 - the price of a new car.
6.1.4. The cost of the car, taking into account operational wear and tear, will be:
RUB 179,712.00 - (RUB 179,712.00 x 21.7% / 100%) = RUB 140,714.50
6.2. Within the framework of the comparative approach, the market value of the car was determined by the method direct comparison with close analogues:
6.2.1. The expert selected the following elements to compare the evaluated car with similar analogues and their values:
a) make, model - VAZ 21074;
b) release date - 2007.
6.2.2. As a result of the analysis of publications of sales advertisements for October 2010, using selected comparison elements from the general population, a sample of 5 offers for the sale of cars on the Moscow market, similar to the one under evaluation, was formed:
Table P 12.1. Description of analog objects
| Factor | Object of assessment | Analogue 1 | Analogue 2 | Analogue 3 | Analogue 4 | Analogue 5 |
| brand, model | VAZ 21074 | VAZ 21074 | VAZ 21074 | VAZ 21074 | VAZ 21074 | VAZ 21074 |
| Location of the object | Moscow | Moscow | Moscow | Moscow | Moscow | Moscow |
| Deal or offer | offer | offer | offer | offer | offer | |
| Seller type | individual | individual | individual | individual | individual | individual |
| Offer date | October 2010 | October 2010 | October 2010 | October 2010 | October 2010 | October 2010 |
| Mileage, km | 50000 | 64000 | 65000 | 65000 | 60000 | 53000 |
| Year of issue | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 |
| Vehicle condition | good | good | good | good | good | good |
| Vehicle version: | ||||||
| Body type | sedan | sedan | sedan | sedan | sedan | sedan |
| engine's type | gasoline, distribution split injection |
gasoline, distribution split injection |
gasoline, distribution split injection |
gasoline, distribution split injection |
gasoline, distribution split injection |
gasoline, distribution split injection |
| Engine displacement, cubic meters cm | 1569 | 1569 | 1569 | 1569 | 1569 | 1569 |
| Engine power, hp | 74 | 74 | 74 | 74 | 74 | 74 |
| Transmission | mechanical | mechanical | mechanical | mechanical | mechanical | mechanical |
| Drive unit | rear | rear | rear | rear | rear | rear |
| Enamel type | no effects | no effects | no effects | no effects | no effects | no effects |
| 115000 | 120000 | 125000 | 125000 | 127000 | ||
| Possibility of bargaining | Price negotiating is possible | Price negotiating is possible | Price negotiating is possible | Price negotiating is possible | Price negotiating is possible | |
| Source of information website http://cars.auto. ru/cars/used/sale/... | .../29063282-814f.html | .../28846382-bf4a4.html | .../28490756-ecefc.html | .../12371213-e9b5a.html | .../12371213-d21aa.html |
6.2.3. Since the mileage of the analogues differs from the mileage of the property being assessed, their values were adjusted:
Table P 12.2. Adjusting the costs of analogue objects
| Factor | Object of assessment | Analogue 1 | Analogue 2 | Analogue 3 | Analogue 4 | Analogue 5 |
| brand, model | VAZ 21074 | VAZ 21074 | VAZ 21074 | VAZ 21074 | VAZ 21074 | VAZ 21074 |
| Location of the object | Moscow | Moscow | Moscow | Moscow | Moscow | Moscow |
| Deal or offer | offer | offer | offer | offer | offer | |
| Seller type | individual | individual | individual | individual | individual | individual |
| Offer date | Oct. 10 | Oct. 10 | Oct. 10 | Oct. 10 | Oct. 10 | Oct. 10 |
| Mileage, km | 50000 | 64000 | 65000 | 65000 | 60000 | 43000 |
| Price requested by the seller, rub. | 115 000.0 | 120 000.0 | 125 000.0 | 125 000.0 | 127 000.0 | |
| Year of issue | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 | 2007 |
| Wear by mileage, % | 17.5% | 22.4% | 22.8% | 22.8% | 21.0% | 15.1% |
| Service life, years | 3.5 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 |
| Average annual mileage, thousand km | 14.3 | 16.8 | 17.1 | 17.1 | 15.8 | 11.3 |
| Wear over service life, % | 4.2% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 4.4% | 4.6% | 5.3% |
| Total wear, % | 21.7% | 26.8% | 27.2% | 27.2% | 25.6% | 20.4% |
| Correction coefficient | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.06 | 1.04 | 0.99 | |
| Adjusted cost, rub. | 120 750.0 | 127 200.0 | 132 500.0 | 130 000.0 | 125 730.0 |
6.2.4. To determine the average supply price, five price values were selected: RUB 120,750.00; RUB 127,200.00; RUB 132,500.00; RUB 130,000.00; 125730.00 rub.
6.2.5. average price proposals will be:
(RUB 120,750.00 + RUB 127,200.00 + RUB 132,500.00 + RUB 130,000.00 + RUB 125,730.00) / 5 = RUB 127,236.00
The predicted market value of the car (purchase price) can be adjusted taking into account bargaining and will be about 95% of the offer price, namely: RUB 120,874.20.
7. Reconciliation of results
The purpose of harmonizing the results is to determine the most likely value of property rights to the objects being valued, by weighing the advantages and disadvantages of the approaches used.
7.1. The advantages and disadvantages of the applied approaches and methods were assessed on a five-point scale according to the following criteria:
7.1.1. Reliability of the information on which the study was conducted (K1):
When determining the cost using a comparative approach, the expert used archival sources of information about analogues, which contain short description main characteristics and condition of analogues. Therefore, it is not possible to verify the published information at the time of the study. Information used in cost-effective approach, the expert has no doubts.
V K1 ZP = 5; V K1 SP = 3
7.1.2. Sufficiency of information on which the study was conducted (K2):
When determining the value using a comparative approach, the expert used archival sources of information about analogues, which contain a brief description of the main characteristics and condition of the analogues. Therefore, it is sufficient to evaluate technical condition analogues and the level of their equipment at the time of the study is not possible.
Taking into account the above, according to this criterion, the expert assigned the following weights to the approaches:
V K2 ZP = 5; V K2 SP = 3.
7.1.3. The ability of the approach (method) to take into account market conditions (K3):
When determining value using a comparative approach, information about analogues is used that reflects trends secondary market. As a result of using this information, you can get a relatively more accurate idea of the market value of the object than when determining the value using the cost approach.
Taking into account the above, according to this criterion, the expert assigned the following weights to the approaches:
V K3 ZP = 2; V K3 SP = 5.
7.1.4. The ability of the approach (method) to take into account the influence of pricing factors inherent in the object and its analogues (K4):
According to the expert, in in this case retrospective assessment, analogues and the object of assessment have identical consumer properties, conditions of sale and location. Therefore, in this case, the applied approaches equally take into account the influence of pricing factors inherent in the object and its analogues.
Taking into account the above, according to this criterion, the expert assigned the following weights to the approaches:
V K4 ZP = 4; V K4 SP = 5.
The results of weighing the applied approaches are reflected in Table P 12.3.
Table P 12.3. Determining Approach Weights
| Evaluation criterion | Scores assigned to criteria | |
| Expensive | Comparative | |
| Reliability of the information on which the study was conducted (K 1) | 5 | 3 |
| Sufficiency of information on the basis of which the study was conducted (K 2) | 5 | 3 |
| The ability of the approach (method) to take into account market conditions (K 3) | 2 | 5 |
| The ability of the approach (method) to take into account the influence of pricing factors inherent in the object and its analogues (K 4) | 5 | 5 |
| Sum of points for each approach | 17 | 16 |
| Sum of points for all approaches | 33 | |
| Approach weight | 0.52 | 0.48 |
7.2. Coordination of results by approach:
With agreement = With salary x In salary + With sp x In joint = 149714.5 rub. x 0.52 + 120874.20 rub. x 0.48 = 131191.1 rub.
font size
METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE RESIDUAL VALUE OF VEHICLES TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT OF TECHNICAL CONDITION - R-03112194-0376-98 (approved by the Ministry of Transport... Relevant in 2018
EXAMPLE OF COMPLETING A VEHICLE EVALUATION REPORT
1. Basis for the assessment: agreement on the assessment of the vehicle dated January 4, 1999 No. 1 with the Customer - Limited Liability Company "ROSTO".
2. Goals and objectives of the assessment: assessment residual value vehicle for sale purposes.
3. Object of assessment - vehicle:
Type - passenger car
Make, model - MERSEDES-BENZ 300 SE 2.8
Vehicle passport: series 77AA N 1234567
Special notes: the car was imported from Germany to the Russian Federation, cleared through customs, registered with the State Traffic Inspectorate and put on the balance sheet of ROSTO LLC in January 1996. Total number of car owners - 2 (one in Germany - according to German technical passport, one in Russia - in accordance with the vehicle passport).
4. Owner of the vehicle: ROSTO LLC.
Owner's address: 123456, Moscow, Moskovskaya st., 1.
6. Place of assessment: Moscow
7. Book value of the vehicle: 125 thousand rubles.
8. When conducting the assessment, the following documents are used:
8.1. Vehicle assessment standards: -
8.2. Methodological and normative - technical documents: "Methodology for assessing the residual value of vehicles taking into account the technical condition. R-03112194-0376-98." Approved by the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation on December 10, 1998.
8.3. Information Support: directory SUPERSCHWACKE (EUROTAX), directory CALCULATION (EUROTAX).
9. Calculation of mileage from the start of operation:
The car was operated for the first 3 years in Germany, the next 3 years - in Russian Federation. According to the SUPERSCHWACKE (EUROTAX) manual, the MERSEDES-BENZ 300 SE 2.8 belongs to category 5.4. The actual mileage from the beginning of operation is calculated using formula (13) in accordance with the data in Table P6.2 and Table P6.3 "Methods for assessing the residual value of vehicles taking into account the technical condition. R-03112194-0376-98" as follows:
Actual mileage since the start of operation (determined by calculation): 109.9 thousand km.
10. Calculation of the residual value of the vehicle.
10.1. Calculation of the residual value of an incomplete vehicle in working condition, on which no units have been replaced or re-equipped, and there are no malfunctions or operational defects.
The calculation is carried out market method. According to newspapers, magazines and other printed publications with information on the cost of used imported passenger cars, as well as according to data from consignment stores, a sample of the following cost values was obtained passenger car MERSEDES-BENZ 300 SE 2.8 models with an age of 6 years and mileage since the beginning of operation of about 110 thousand km within the boundaries of the secondary vehicle market in the Moscow region: $17,000, $16,500, $20,000, $17,000, $16,500, $18,000, $18,200 , $17,500.
Calculated value = $17587.5.
The dollar exchange rate as of January 10, 1999, established by the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, is 22 rubles per 1 US dollar. Calculated value = RUB 386,925.
The coefficient of variation is 0.065. The sample is homogeneous.
10.2. Calculation of the physical wear and tear of the vehicle I_f on the valuation date is carried out according to formula (20) "Methods for assessing the residual value of vehicles taking into account the technical condition. R-03112194-0376-98". In accordance with Table 2 of the specified methodology, the OMEGA value for passenger cars is calculated European production:
OMEGA = 0.05 x 6 + 0.0025 x 109.9 = 0.30 + 0.275 = 0.575.
Using formula (20) or the table in Appendix 9 "Methods for estimating the residual value of vehicles taking into account the technical condition. R-03112194-0376-98" we determine that with OMEGA = 0.575, physical wear and tear is 43.7%.
Physical wear and tear of the vehicle as of the assessment date I_f = 43.7%.
10.3. Calculation of the residual value component, taking into account replacement of units (units, systems, equipment) basic configuration to similar ones.
10.3.1. Calculation as of the date of assessment of the physical wear of tires, battery and muffler installed when replacing similar components and elements.
Since there are no damages or defects to the tires, the physical wear of the tires is calculated using the formula:
The physical wear of tires installed on a car is equal to:
The physical wear of the spare wheel tire is equal to:
Physical deterioration battery equal to:
Calculation of the physical wear and tear of the muffler as of the assessment date is carried out using formula (20) "Methods for assessing the residual value of vehicles taking into account the technical condition. R-03112194-0376-98". In accordance with Table 2 of the specified methodology, the OMEGA value is calculated for passenger cars of European production:
OMEGA = 0.05 x 3 + 0.0025 x 41 = 0.15 + 0.103 = 0.253.
Using formula (20) or the table in Appendix 9 “Methods for assessing the residual value of vehicles taking into account the technical condition. R-03112194-0376-98” we determine that with OMEGA = 0.253, the physical wear of the muffler is 22.4%. Thus = 22.4%.
10.3.2. The values of cost in new condition and physical wear and tear of units (elements) of the basic configuration installed to replace similar ones are given in Table 1.
Table 1
The calculated value of the residual value component, which takes into account the replacement of units (units, systems, equipment) of the basic configuration with similar ones, is equal to:
10.4. The calculation of the component taking into account the dismantling of the vehicle (except for replacements during re-equipment) is carried out in accordance with Table 2.
table 2
The calculated value of the component taking into account the disassembly of the vehicle (except for replacements during re-equipment) is equal to:
10.5. Calculation of vehicle obsolescence as of the valuation date.
According to the “Methodology for assessing the residual value of vehicles taking into account the technical condition. R-03112194-0376-98,” production of the MERSEDES-BENZ 300 SE 2.8 passenger car was discontinued in 1994. Since on the assessment date less than 10 years have passed since the vehicle was discontinued, the value of the first obsolescence factor, which takes into account the removal of the vehicle from production as of the assessment date, is calculated using the formula:
I_M1 = 2 x T_sn % = 2 x 4 = 8%.
The obsolescence factor, which takes into account the cessation of production of spare parts for the vehicle, is equal to I_M2 = 0%, since according to the CALCULATION directory (EUROTAX), the production of spare parts for the MERSEDES-BENZ 300 SE 2.8 car continues. The specified spare parts can be purchased in the Moscow region. Obsolescence factor, which takes into account that the vehicle was previously involved in a road accident traffic accident(specified in the customer’s application) is equal to I_M3 = 5%. The obsolescence factor, taking into account the number of owners, I_M4 = 0%, since the total number of owners of the evaluated car is less than 4.
Obsolescence of the vehicle as of the valuation date I_M = 13%.
10.6. Calculation of the component taking into account the re-equipment of the vehicle by installation additional equipment without replacing basic units on the assessment date, is carried out in accordance with Table 3.
Table 3
The calculated value of the component taking into account the re-equipment of a vehicle by installing additional equipment without replacing basic units on the assessment date is equal to:
10.7. Calculation of the cost of elimination of failures, malfunctions and operational defects as of the assessment date is carried out as follows.
The cost of repair work is calculated in accordance with Table 4.
Car valuation
for the court when dividing property
Time frame: from 30 min. Price: from 1000 rub.
Dear Clients!
Due to big amount requests we are working
by PRE-REGISTRATION.
In the Armed Forces and holidays- specialists work ONLY by appointment.
Our specialists will evaluate the car for the court when dividing property, resolving legal disputes and proceedings, for entering into an inheritance, for a notary. Our experts are ready to quickly and accurately determine the market value of vehicles of all makes and models in any condition. You will receive it in your hands required package documents (appraisal report), which will be executed in accordance with Federal law on valuation activities and Federal valuation standards. The appraisal report will be bound and sealed by the company; attached will be a copy of the documents for the company’s appraisal activities. The car valuation report for the division of property from the Automobiles company has legal force and will be accepted in any court in Moscow and the Moscow region.
As quickly as possible
The vehicle assessment report for the court is completed in 30 to 60 minutes in your presence. While the report is being prepared, you can make mall"Cars" necessary purchases spare parts or accessories for your car. You can also send us an email [email protected] scans of everyone necessary documents and agree by phone on the date and time of your arrival. All you have to do is pick up a ready-made report on the valuation of the car for the court.
No inspection needed
To assess the value of a car for the court when dividing property, it is not required to submit it for inspection. A car valuation report can be prepared based on the documents of the car owner.
More than 15 years on the market
The company "Automobiles" LLC was founded in 1997 subsidiary consignment car shop and for more than 15 years we have been offering our customers wide range auto services, including the sale of used cars. All this time we have been working closely with the first commission trading house "Automobiles", which occupies one of the leading positions in the field commission sales cars for over 40 years. A vehicle assessment department has been created especially for our clients, staffed by leading appraisers who have certificates from the self-regulatory organization “Interregional Union of Appraisers” and a professional liability insurance policy. All appraisers have the necessary qualifications and work experience of more than 20 years.
What documents are needed to evaluate a car when dividing property?
- PTS for a car
- STS (vehicle certificate)
- passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation ordering an assessment report for the court
Working hours: Mon-Fri from 9 to 20, Sat from 9 to 18
Other types of assessment
It is important to know
The vehicle assessment report for the court contains
- Assessment task
- Copies of the customer’s title documents
- Description of the Valuation Object
- Car market analysis
- Description of approaches to estimating the cost of a car
- Calculation of the market value of a car in accordance with the rules for implementing valuation approaches
The assessment report has legal force and is drawn up in full accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation. In the report, the expert reflects his opinion on the market value of the car, based on the market research conducted, the materials presented and the calculations performed. Our company’s appraisers take into account all the subtleties and nuances of legislation and court requirements.
The cost of the car is indicated in statement of claim and is used to calculate state duty.
A car is appraised for court by an expert who is a member of the self-regulatory organization “Interregional Union of Appraisers” and has a professional liability insurance policy.
The cost of the car in the statement of claim must be legally justified, which is why it will not be possible to independently evaluate the car.
The assessment of the value of a car for the court during the division of property must be carried out in accordance with the regulations specified in the Federal Law “On Valuation Activities” and carried out in accordance with the Federal Law on Valuation Activities No. 135 and the Federal Valuation Standards FSO No. 1, 2, 3.
Methodology for determining the cost of a car
The valuation of a car during the division of property is carried out in a simplified form, based on the customer’s documents, without inspecting the vehicle.
The main data for the assessment are the documents for the machine provided by the customer. When evaluating a car for court or donation purposes, it is used comparative approach, because the cost of a car depends on the market situation at a particular time in a particular region. Using this approach gives the most objective result, in contrast to the costly method, because The market value is influenced by market prices for cars with the same characteristics, and not by the cost of additional investments, repairs and tuning of the car.
The market value of a car is the price at which a car can be sold on a free market, taking into account current competition. The main factors influencing the price of a car are: age and technical condition of the car, make and model of the car, body type, region of sale, condition automobile market at the time of assessment.
When you may need to find out the exact cost of a car:
- when dividing property
- in case of divorce
- when inheriting property
- tax calculation disputes
- upon confiscation of debtors' property
The vehicle is assessed for trial by an expert included in the state register of expert technicians.
An independent assessment report for cars and vehicles is drawn up according to the Federal Assessment Standard:
- The sheets are numbered and sealed with the seal of the appraising company.
- The entire report is bound, and a copy of the document is added to the attachment, which confirms the company’s right to carry out this type of activity.
- To perform an independent assessment, it is necessary to present a copy of the death certificate of the car owner and the passport details of the person ordering the assessment.
We evaluate vehicles for the following needs:
- car damage assessment after an accident- our experts will conduct an independent assessment of the cost of restoration repairs, damage and damage received by the car to calculate the correct amount of insurance payment
- car valuation as collateral- you will receive a report on the market value of your car, which you will need when applying for a loan or when you evaluate the car as movable property for the embassy if you are going abroad
- car valuation when dividing property- the act of assessing the value of the car will help settle the dispute over the division of the car ex-spouses and to know Exact size monetary compensation reimbursed by one of the spouses
- valuation of the car when contributing to the authorized capital of the company- we carry out assessment work for legal entities in any volumes and any types of vehicles
We are ready to evaluate vehicles: cars, trucks, motorcycles, cars, as well as real estate: apartments, houses, land plots.
When choosing a company to evaluate a car for court during the division of property, it is important to understand that a report made in violation of the current legislation on valuation activities in the Russian Federation cannot be accepted by the court as non-compliant with regulations.
